Source-led head-to-head · 2024 ACS
Moving from Little Rock to Los Angeles
Based on the 2024 ACS 5-year estimates, comparing Little Rock, Arkansas, and Los Angeles, California, reveals distinct trade-offs between affordability and economic scale. Little Rock features a population of 203,436, a median household income of $63,003, a median gross rent of $1,106, a median home value of $236,400, and a 20-minute commute. Los Angeles supports 3,857,263 residents with a higher median income of $81,939, but significantly higher housing costs, including a median gross rent of $1,933, a median home value of $921,200, and a longer 33-minute commute. Additionally, Los Angeles incorporates a 9.30% state individual income-tax reference, whereas Little Rock's profile excludes state tax data. Neither city serves as a universal winner.
Moving from Little Rock to Los Angeles
Moving to Los Angeles costs ~$9,924 more/yr in rent.
~$9,300 more state tax on a $100k salary in California.
Difference of ~108 hours per year spent commuting based on 2024 ACS midpoint averages.
Compare the life behind the offer.
Adjust the assumptions. Every result updates instantly.
Search all 32,330 U.S. Census places directly below.Instant results use official 2024 ACS place data. Places with incomplete required signals remain visible in search but cannot be selected.
Directional estimate using ACS citywide benchmarks. Verified profiles may include a simplified state-tax reference; automatically added profiles exclude state tax until an official reference is approved. Exact tax, benefits, debt, housing, insurance, and personal circumstances may materially change the result.
The offer needs work
The destination absorbs more of the offer.The short answer
In the uniform one-person renting baseline, Little Rock is about $9,924 lower per year. This is not a verdict by itself: replace city medians with the actual offer, address, household, benefits, insurance, and tax details before deciding.
Housing, income, and tax reference
| Metric | Little Rock | Los Angeles |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 ACS population | 203,436 | 3,857,263 |
| Median household income | $63,003 | $81,939 |
| Median gross rent | $1,106 | $1,933 |
| Median owner-occupied home value | $236,400 | $921,200 |
| State-tax treatment | Excluded | 9.3% simplified |
Time and daily routine
The commute-time distribution produces a weighted one-way estimate of about 20 minutes in Little Rock and 33 minutes in Los Angeles. This citywide estimate cannot capture a specific route, remote-work schedule, or transit choice, so the calculator converts it into an explicit time difference instead of hiding it in a subjective lifestyle score.
Decision checklist
- Little Rock offers significantly lower median gross rent
- Los Angeles features a higher median household income
- Little Rock provides a shorter one-way commute estimate
- Los Angeles has substantially higher owner-occupied home values
What each city wins
Little Rock
Affordability uncertain. Watch housing costs vs income.
Los Angeles
A large labor market with a household-income benchmark above New York's. Watch a $921,200 ownership benchmark and a conservative marginal california tax reference.
Frequently asked questions
How do the populations of Little Rock and Los Angeles compare?
According to the 2024 ACS 5-year estimates, Little Rock has an estimated population of 203,436, whereas Los Angeles is much larger with 3,857,263 residents.
What are the housing cost differences between the two cities?
The 2024 ACS data shows that Little Rock has a median gross rent of $1,106 and a median home value of $236,400, compared to Los Angeles, where median gross rent is $1,933 and median home value is $921,200.
Source boundary: Core figures come from the 2024 ACS five-year tables linked on each city profile. Commute is derived from B08303 midpoint weighting. A state-tax value without an approved official reference is excluded and disclosed. This comparison becomes index-eligible only after its unique analysis clears the content quality gate.