Source-led head-to-head · 2024 ACS
Moving from Lubbock to Chicago
Comparing Lubbock, Texas, and Chicago, Illinois, using 2024 ACS data reveals distinct financial and logistical trade-offs. Lubbock offers a more affordable housing market with a median gross rent of $1,182 and a median home value of $212,400, alongside a shorter derived one-way commute of 18 minutes and a median household income of $60,895. In contrast, Chicago features a higher median household income of $77,902, but higher housing costs with a median gross rent of $1,440 and a median home value of $334,100, paired with a longer 36-minute commute and a simplified 4.95% state income tax reference. Neither city serves as a universal winner, as the choice depends entirely on individual priorities regarding income potential, tax structure, and housing expenses.
Moving from Lubbock to Chicago
Moving to Chicago costs ~$3,096 more/yr in rent.
~$4,950 more state tax on a $100k salary in Illinois.
Difference of ~150 hours per year spent commuting based on 2024 ACS midpoint averages.
Compare the life behind the offer.
Adjust the assumptions. Every result updates instantly.
Search all 32,330 U.S. Census places directly below.Instant results use official 2024 ACS place data. Places with incomplete required signals remain visible in search but cannot be selected.
Directional estimate using ACS citywide benchmarks. Verified profiles may include a simplified state-tax reference; automatically added profiles exclude state tax until an official reference is approved. Exact tax, benefits, debt, housing, insurance, and personal circumstances may materially change the result.
The offer needs work
Your modeled annual room improves.The short answer
In the uniform one-person renting baseline, Lubbock is about $3,096 lower per year. This is not a verdict by itself: replace city medians with the actual offer, address, household, benefits, insurance, and tax details before deciding.
Housing, income, and tax reference
| Metric | Lubbock | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 ACS population | 264,814 | 2,711,226 |
| Median household income | $60,895 | $77,902 |
| Median gross rent | $1,182 | $1,440 |
| Median owner-occupied home value | $212,400 | $334,100 |
| State-tax treatment | Excluded | 4.95% simplified |
Time and daily routine
The commute-time distribution produces a weighted one-way estimate of about 18 minutes in Lubbock and 36 minutes in Chicago. This citywide estimate cannot capture a specific route, remote-work schedule, or transit choice, so the calculator converts it into an explicit time difference instead of hiding it in a subjective lifestyle score.
Decision checklist
- Median household income differences
- Gross rent and home value variations
- Derived one-way commute times
- State individual income-tax presence
What each city wins
Lubbock
Median rent consumes 23% of median income, below the 30% affordability benchmark.. Watch low rent-to-income ratio may be offset by high non-housing costs per model assumptions..
Chicago
Median rent is 22% of median income, below common affordability benchmarks.. Watch lower rent burden may reflect older housing stock or income distribution, not necessarily lower housing quality or availability..
Frequently asked questions
How do median gross rents compare between Lubbock and Chicago?
According to the 2024 ACS data, the median gross rent in Lubbock is $1,182 per month, whereas in Chicago, the median gross rent is higher at $1,440 per month.
What are the estimated one-way commute times for both cities?
Based on 2024 ACS table B08303, the derived one-way commute estimate is 18 minutes for Lubbock and 36 minutes for Chicago.
Source boundary: Core figures come from the 2024 ACS five-year tables linked on each city profile. Commute is derived from B08303 midpoint weighting. A state-tax value without an approved official reference is excluded and disclosed. This comparison becomes index-eligible only after its unique analysis clears the content quality gate.